Kenya’s By-Elections Under Siege as Rights Group Warns of Democratic Backsliding

Kenya’s fragile democratic gains face a stern test as the country heads into by-elections under a cloud of violence, state interference, and deepening political intolerance. 
The Kenya Human Rights Commission (KHRC) has issued a dire warning that the polls, rather than strengthening democracy, risk exposing a nation sliding dangerously toward institutional erosion.

The by-elections, covering 24 electoral areas—including seven constituencies and 17 wards—were intended to restore representation to communities that have gone without elected leadership and essential public services. Instead, they have become a flashpoint for political contestation marked by intimidation, lawlessness, and open abuse of state power.

According to KHRC, hotspots such as Kasipul, Mbeere North, Magarini, and Malava have recorded politically instigated violence involving armed groups and coordinated attacks. At least four people have been killed, with several others injured. Disturbingly, some of these attacks have circulated on video, laying bare a deliberate strategy to instill fear, suppress voter turnout, and manipulate electoral outcomes through force.

Even more troubling, the rights body accuses senior state officials—including top executive leaders and Cabinet figures—of discarding the constitutional duty of neutrality. Public resources and state machinery, KHRC says, have been openly mobilized for partisan campaign purposes, in direct violation of constitutional standards on integrity and accountability.

The Commission further alleges that both the ruling Kenya Kwanza administration and opposition forces have engaged in voter bribery and the manipulation of public appointments to influence the polls. Such actions, KHRC warns, do not merely distort the by-elections but create a dangerous rehearsal for the 2027 General Election—normalizing corruption, coercion, and political violence as tools of power.

At the heart of public concern is whether the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) can assert its independence under intense political pressure. KHRC has demanded that the electoral body enforce the law without fear or favor and guarantee a process that is transparent, impartial, and professionally administered.

Equally significant is the role of security agencies. Reports of unidentified and unregistered security personnel have heightened fears of voter intimidation. KHRC insists that all officers deployed must be clearly identifiable, properly documented, and strictly confined to their constitutional mandate of protecting voters—not policing political choices.

The Commission has also placed the spotlight on the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC), demanding immediate investigations into the abuse of public office, questionable pre-election appointments, and the suspected diversion of public funds for campaign activities. Accountability, KHRC argues, is the only path to restoring public confidence in the rule of law.